L. Scales

Ball-playing centre-back2022–23 · final Aberdeen season
30(1)
Apps
2,672
Min
1
G
1
A
Compare vs
What kind of centre-back is Scales?
Percentiles vs Aberdeen centre-backs · all player-seasons 2021–22 to 2026–27 · min 200 minutes (32 player-seasons)
Strongest on aerials and ball rec; pass accuracy is the least dominant part of the profile.
Tackles / 901.070th
Interceptions / 901.258th
Aerials / 905.195th
Aerial Win %64%64th
Clearances / 905.448th
Ball Rec / 905.986th
Pass Accuracy75%20th
xA / 900.0477th
A style profile, not a rating — percentiles are within Aberdeen player pools only, not league-wide.
Chance Creation · WhoScored events
10
Key Passes
1
Assists
13
Pre-Assists
184
Prog. Passes
#3 squad
12
Box Entries
5
Dribbles
Key passes = passes that led to a shot. Pre-assists = the pass before the assist. 31 apps, 2875 mins · squad ranks among 300+ min players.
Role fingerprint · style, not ability · vs Aberdeen centre-backs, player-seasons 2021–22 to 2026–27, 450+ minutes
All players →
Ball-playing centre-back2022-23 role · from this player’s strongest traits vs centre-backs
Scales profiles as a ball-playing centre-back: strongest on ball-winning; passing threat is the least dominant part of the profile. Style vs other Aberdeen centre-backs — not a rating.
Threat added by passes (xT), per 90Passing38th pct0.10 xT/90Threat of the positions where they receive the ball (xT), per 90Receiving48th pct0.04 xT/90Threat added by carries and dribbles (xT), per 90Carrying55th pct0.05 xT/90Shots per 90 — goals are too noisy a measure for defendersShot volume58th pct0.66 sh/90Tackles, interceptions and recoveries per 90Ball-winning94th pct13.1/90
Plays like
Mats Knoester24-25 · Ball-playing centre-backMats Knoester25-26 · Ball-playing centre-backMats Knoester26-27 · Ball-playing centre-back
Similarity is style, not ability — nearest profile among Aberdeen defender-seasons by the five threat categories, not a performance ranking.
A style fingerprint, not a rating — single-club sample. How these numbers work
Rank vs 149 player-seasons, 2021–27 (200+ min)

Shooting

66
Goals
10.03/90
46th
Open Play
0
Penalties
0
xG
1.570.05/90
43rd
Shots
220.74/90
33rd
Shots on Target
30.10/90
64th
Conversion
5%
73rd

Creation

75
Assists
10.03/90
19th
xA
1.110.04/90
55th
Key Passes
100.34/90
53rd
Big Chances
20.07/90
29th

Passing

70
Passes
148550.02/90
7th
Pass Accuracy
75%
83rd
Receptions
90430.45/90
Crosses
120.40/90
75th
Long Balls
1796.03/90
20th

Defending

96
Tackles
521.75/90
10th
Interceptions
371.25/90
5th
Recoveries
1765.93/90
13th
Duels Won
2247.54/90
5th
Aerials Won
1515.09/90
1st
Clearances
1595.36/90
4th

Touch Heatmap

Season — 31 apps — 800 touches
ATTACKING →
Style archetype

Aerial / Front-Foot Centre-back

percentile vs 26 Aberdeen seasons
Aerial Dominator84th
Front-Foot Progressor73rd
Deep Volume Defender42nd

How well supported: 65%. Clustering the same 23 seasons without our labels puts 65% of them in the group our archetype names would predict. That is a weak match — read the four scores, not the headline label. No position separates cleanly into discrete types (silhouette 0.17); these are continua, and the scores describe position along them.

A percentile, not a success rate: 67th means he did more of it than two thirds of the 26 Aberdeen centre-back seasons on record. Context, not a league benchmark. Style, not rating: goals, assists and conversion feed none of these scores. Evidence behind it: high confidence (100) on 2,672 minutes, 31 of 31 matches with event data.

Service profile

What suits him

Where he contests headers
Own third105 duels · won 61%
Middle third95 duels · won 68%
Attacking third37 duels · won 59%
won contested
Box touches / 90
1.21
Lay-offs completed
—
Pass completion
75%
Offsides
1

Reading, not a measurement. 95 of his 237 aerial duels came in the middle third and he won 68% of them. His box work is worth 1.2 touches per 90 by comparison. On that split, his value is arriving in the box rather than winning the first ball in midfield. Nothing here records who passed to him — the data has no receiving-player field — so this is an inference from where he competed, not a measurement of the service he got.

Formation fit

Which shape he plays in

ShapeAppsMinG/90Sh/90Aerial %
3-5-2141,2600.000.6473%
4-2-3-198060.001.1252%
3-1-4-232700.000.0055%

Shape is the side's starting formation for each match, so a game where Aberdeen changed at half time counts wholly to what they started in — mid-match spells are only recorded for the current season. 4 further shapes fall below 270 minutes (4-4-2, 3-4-3, 3-4-1-2, 4-3-3) and are left out rather than ranked on noise. Goals per 90 across 3 shapes is a small sample either way — treat it as a pointer, not a finding.

Aberdeen history

Plays most like

  1. Mattie Pollock2022/2377
    closest on Into the final third, Aerial contests, Progressive passes
  2. Richard Jensen2023/2477
    closest on Pass completion, Recoveries in the opposition half, Defensive actions
  3. Stefan Gartenmann2023/2476
    closest on Clearances, Aerial win rate, Defensive actions

Nearest style profile among 26 Aberdeen centre-back seasons, across the model’s on-ball dimensions. Not a ranking: this asks who he plays like, not who was better.

Outside Aberdeen

Against other clubs

Percentile against 90 players from 10 other Scottish clubs, in their matches against Aberdeen. Shares of his own actions rather than per-90: opponent minutes are derived from the lineup, good enough to require 450 of them but not precise enough to divide by.

Aerial duels per 100 touches86th
Headed share of passes82nd
Clearances per 100 touches80th
Pass completion72nd
Passes per 100 touches69th
Tackles + interceptions per 100 touches47th
Progressive passes per 100 touches47th
Shots per 100 touches38th
Share of touches in the box37th
Crosses per 100 touches31st
Key passes per 100 touches29th
Passes into the box per 100 touches23rd
Take-ons per 100 touches21st

Celtic and Rangers are left out of the pool. With them in, they held 8 of the top 10 for passing and none of the top 10 for aerials — they distorted every feature one way or the other. Without them the remaining ten clubs behave alike enough that a player's club explains under a sixth of the variance in any of these, so all of them are readable as the player rather than the team.

Based on 31 Aberdeen matches and 2,039 touches this season, against opponents with at least 450 minutes against us across five years. Every feature shown agrees with itself when a player's matches are split in half and measured twice; aerial win rate and take-on success do not on this sample, so they are left out. These are still matches against one specific side — enough to place a player, not to quote as league form.

Profile match

Who else plays like this

Players from 10 other Scottish clubs who reach Scales's level on all four of the things that most characterise him.

Matched on
Aerial duels per 100 toucheshim 86th·needs 76th
Headed share of passeshim 82nd·needs 72nd
Clearances per 100 toucheshim 80th·needs 70th
Pass completionhim 72nd·needs 62nd
  1. Stuart FindlayKilmarnock93 · 88 · 98 · 66
  2. Vicko SeveljDundee United79 · 82 · 94 · 63

2 of 90 pool players match. The pool is opponents with at least 450 minutes against Aberdeen across five years — roughly four matches a season each, and only against us. This is a prompt to go and watch someone, not a scouting verdict, and it cannot see anyone who has not played us.

Recruitment & squad role

Summer 2022 window →
Signing window
Summer 2022
Arrival
1 Jul 2022, loan, from Celtic, aged 23
League starts
30 of 38 (79%)
Appearances
31, plus 0 unused in a squad
Utilisation
2,672 of 3,420 possible minutes (78%)
Assessment
Loan spell: 38 league matches counted

Loan: the 50% test is not applied to loans.

League matches only. The 50% rule tests whether a signing established himself, not whether he was bought to start or was available: injuries and role are not recorded. Utilisation is minutes played as a share of the minutes available.

Match-by-match breakdown is available for the current season only.
Data via Sofascore