J. Mackenzie
Shooting
53Creation
65Passing
78Defending
77Touch Heatmap
Defensive Full-back
How well supported: 71%. Clustering the same 17 seasons without our labels puts 71% of them in the group our archetype names would predict. The lines we drew broadly match the ones in the data. No position separates cleanly into discrete types (silhouette 0.22); these are continua, and the scores describe position along them.
A percentile, not a success rate: 67th means he did more of it than two thirds of the 17 Aberdeen full-back seasons on record. Context, not a league benchmark. Style, not rating: goals, assists and conversion feed none of these scores. Evidence behind it: high confidence (100) on 1,950 minutes, 25 of 25 matches with event data.
What suits him
Reading, not a measurement. 41 of his 79 aerial duels came in the middle third and he won 54% of them. His box work is worth 1.8 touches per 90 by comparison. On that split, his value is arriving in the box rather than winning the first ball in midfield. Nothing here records who passed to him — the data has no receiving-player field — so this is an inference from where he competed, not a measurement of the service he got.
Which shape he plays in
| Shape | Apps | Min | G/90 | Sh/90 | Aerial % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2-3-1 | 25 | 1,950 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 41% |
Shape is the side's starting formation for each match, so a game where Aberdeen changed at half time counts wholly to what they started in — mid-match spells are only recorded for the current season.
Plays most like
- Alexander Jensen2024/2576closest on Crosses, Duel win rate, Passes into the box
- Alexander Jensen2025/2676closest on Final-third touches, Pass xT, Duel win rate
- Mitchel Frame2025/2673closest on Clearances, Crosses, Tackles + interceptions
Nearest style profile among 17 Aberdeen full-back seasons, across the model’s on-ball dimensions. Not a ranking: this asks who he plays like, not who was better.
Against other clubs
Percentile against 90 players from 10 other Scottish clubs, in their matches against Aberdeen. Shares of his own actions rather than per-90: opponent minutes are derived from the lineup, good enough to require 450 of them but not precise enough to divide by.
Celtic and Rangers are left out of the pool. With them in, they held 8 of the top 10 for passing and none of the top 10 for aerials — they distorted every feature one way or the other. Without them the remaining ten clubs behave alike enough that a player's club explains under a sixth of the variance in any of these, so all of them are readable as the player rather than the team.
Based on 25 Aberdeen matches and 1,417 touches this season, against opponents with at least 450 minutes against us across five years. Every feature shown agrees with itself when a player's matches are split in half and measured twice; aerial win rate and take-on success do not on this sample, so they are left out. These are still matches against one specific side — enough to place a player, not to quote as league form.
Who else plays like this
Players from 10 other Scottish clubs who reach MacKenzie's level on all four of the things that most characterise him.
Nobody in the pool clears all four at this level. That is a finding in itself — loosen the match, or read it as a profile the other clubs in here do not have.
0 of 90 pool players match. The pool is opponents with at least 450 minutes against Aberdeen across five years — roughly four matches a season each, and only against us. This is a prompt to go and watch someone, not a scouting verdict, and it cannot see anyone who has not played us.