AFC 1903

J. Richardson

Attacking full-back2022–23 · final Aberdeen season
16(3)
Apps
1,428
Min
0
G
0
A
Compare vs
What kind of full-back is Richardson?
Percentiles vs Aberdeen full-backs · all player-seasons 2021–22 to 2026–27 · min 200 minutes (16 player-seasons)
Strongest on xa and key passes; tackles+ints is the least dominant part of the profile.
Key Passes / 900.8872nd
xA / 900.1278th
Crosses / 901.79th
Ball Rec / 904.972nd
Tackles+Ints / 901.33rd
Aerial Win %44%31st
Duel Win %47%16th
Pass Accuracy73%34th
A style profile, not a rating — percentiles are within Aberdeen player pools only, not league-wide.
Chance Creation · WhoScored events
13
Key Passes
0
Assists
5
Pre-Assists
79
Prog. Passes
20
Box Entries
#5 squad
14
Dribbles
Key passes = passes that led to a shot. Pre-assists = the pass before the assist. 19 apps, 1514 mins · squad ranks among 300+ min players.
Role fingerprint · style, not ability · vs Aberdeen full-backs, player-seasons 2021–22 to 2026–27, 450+ minutes
All players →
Attacking full-back2022-23 role · from this player’s strongest traits vs full-backs
Richardson profiles as an attacking full-back: strongest on carrying, receiving, passing threat; ball-winning is the least dominant part of the profile. Style vs other Aberdeen full-backs — not a rating.
Threat added by passes (xT), per 90Passing63rd pct0.14 xT/90Threat of the positions where they receive the ball (xT), per 90Receiving95th pct0.09 xT/90Threat added by carries and dribbles (xT), per 90Carrying99th pct0.13 xT/90Shots per 90 — goals are too noisy a measure for defendersShot volume17th pct0.41 sh/90Tackles, interceptions and recoveries per 90Ball-winning4th pct8.2/90
Plays like
Jack MacKenzie24-25 · Attacking full-backAlexander Jensen25-26 · Attacking full-backAlexander Jensen24-25 · Attacking full-back
Similarity is style, not ability — nearest profile among Aberdeen defender-seasons by the five threat categories, not a performance ranking.
A style fingerprint, not a rating — single-club sample. How these numbers work
Rank vs 141 player-seasons, 2021–27 (200+ min)

Shooting

42
Goals
00.00/90
73rd
xG
0.790.05/90
68th
Shots
70.44/90
85th
Shots on Target
00.00/90
115th
Conversion
0%
73rd

Creation

70
Assists
00.00/90
73rd
xA
1.970.12/90
27th
Key Passes
130.82/90
46th
Big Chances
20.13/90
28th

Passing

53
Passes
44027.73/90
65th
Pass Accuracy
73%
90th
Receptions
38524.26/90
Crosses
271.70/90
42nd
Long Balls
422.65/90
72nd

Defending

59
Tackles
140.88/90
69th
Interceptions
120.76/90
50th
Recoveries
784.92/90
51st
Duels Won
563.53/90
65th
Aerials Won
161.01/90
62nd
Clearances
291.83/90
55th

Touch Heatmap

Season — 19 apps800 touches
ATTACKING →
Style archetype

Mixed profile

percentile vs 17 Aberdeen seasons
Inverted / Possession34th
Overlapper34th
Defensive20th

How well supported: 71%. Clustering the same 17 seasons without our labels puts 71% of them in the group our archetype names would predict. The lines we drew broadly match the ones in the data. No position separates cleanly into discrete types (silhouette 0.22); these are continua, and the scores describe position along them.

A percentile, not a success rate: 67th means he did more of it than two thirds of the 17 Aberdeen full-back seasons on record. Context, not a league benchmark. Style, not rating: goals, assists and conversion feed none of these scores. Evidence behind it: high confidence (100) on 1,428 minutes, 19 of 19 matches with event data.

Service profile

What suits him

Where he contests headers
Own third8 duels · won 63%
Middle third21 duels · won 38%
Attacking third7 duels · won 43%
won contested
Box touches / 90
2.21
Lay-offs completed
100%
Pass completion
73%
Offsides
2

Reading, not a measurement. 21 of his 36 aerial duels came in the middle third and he won 38% of them, which is a poor return for that volume. His box work is worth 2.2 touches per 90 by comparison. On that split, his value is arriving in the box rather than winning the first ball in midfield. Nothing here records who passed to him — the data has no receiving-player field — so this is an inference from where he competed, not a measurement of the service he got.

Formation fit

Which shape he plays in

ShapeAppsMinG/90Sh/90Aerial %
4-2-3-175590.000.4817%
3-5-253690.000.2462%

Shape is the side's starting formation for each match, so a game where Aberdeen changed at half time counts wholly to what they started in — mid-match spells are only recorded for the current season. 3 further shapes fall below 270 minutes (4-4-2, 3-1-4-2, 3-4-1-2) and are left out rather than ranked on noise. Goals per 90 across 2 shapes is a small sample either way — treat it as a pointer, not a finding.

Aberdeen history

Plays most like

  1. Hayden Coulson2022/2375
    closest on Final-third touches, Progressive passes, Pass xT
  2. Emmanuel Gyamfi2025/2675
    closest on Take-ons, Duel win rate, Final-third touches
  3. Alexander Jensen2025/2668
    closest on Passes into the box, Aerial contests, Progressive passes

Nearest style profile among 17 Aberdeen full-back seasons, across the model’s on-ball dimensions. Not a ranking: this asks who he plays like, not who was better.

Outside Aberdeen

Against other clubs

Percentile against 90 players from 10 other Scottish clubs, in their matches against Aberdeen. Shares of his own actions rather than per-90: opponent minutes are derived from the lineup, good enough to require 450 of them but not precise enough to divide by.

Take-ons per 100 touches81st
Share of touches in the box72nd
Pass completion68th
Passes into the box per 100 touches64th
Crosses per 100 touches64th
Key passes per 100 touches63rd
Passes per 100 touches61st
Progressive passes per 100 touches53rd
Clearances per 100 touches48th
Headed share of passes41st
Aerial duels per 100 touches33rd
Shots per 100 touches28th
Tackles + interceptions per 100 touches28th

Celtic and Rangers are left out of the pool. With them in, they held 8 of the top 10 for passing and none of the top 10 for aerials — they distorted every feature one way or the other. Without them the remaining ten clubs behave alike enough that a player's club explains under a sixth of the variance in any of these, so all of them are readable as the player rather than the team.

Based on 19 Aberdeen matches and 802 touches this season, against opponents with at least 450 minutes against us across five years. Every feature shown agrees with itself when a player's matches are split in half and measured twice; aerial win rate and take-on success do not on this sample, so they are left out. These are still matches against one specific side — enough to place a player, not to quote as league form.

Profile match

Who else plays like this

Players from 10 other Scottish clubs who reach Richardson's level on all four of the things that most characterise him.

Matched on
Take-ons per 100 toucheshim 81st·needs 71st
Share of touches in the boxhim 72nd·needs 62nd
Pass completionhim 68th·needs 58th
Passes into the box per 100 toucheshim 64th·needs 54th
  1. Élie YouanHibernian99 · 96 · 72 · 91
  2. Josh MulliganDundee FC93 · 89 · 98 · 67
  3. Callum SlatteryMotherwell84 · 68 · 77 · 65
  4. Jamie McGrathDundee United79 · 66 · 79 · 85
  5. Alan ForrestHearts94 · 83 · 59 · 82
  6. Glenn MiddletonDundee United92 · 88 · 58 · 89

6 of 90 pool players match. The pool is opponents with at least 450 minutes against Aberdeen across five years — roughly four matches a season each, and only against us. This is a prompt to go and watch someone, not a scouting verdict, and it cannot see anyone who has not played us.

Match-by-match breakdown is available for the current season only.
Data via Sofascore