Aberdeen
0–0
FT · Draw
St. Mirren
1.16xG
+0.79AFC xGD
xG0.37
Expected points 2.29–0.73
Tight gameThe verdict
Event data: Opta
Two points dropped on the chances created.
But Aberdeen created the better chances: 0.06 xG per shot to 0.06, and the bigger ones (1–0 big chances).
Result model · all chances
Expected points 2.29 – 0.73
From the full xG (1.16–0.37), penalty included.
Performance model · excl. penalty
Expected 2.29 pts
From non-penalty xG (1.16–0.37). Took 1.
Some misfortune.Aberdeen deserved more than they got from the chances created.
xG timeline
Aberdeen 1.16St. Mirren 0.37GoalAberdeen above · opponent below · shaded = sustained pressure
Each step is a shot; the line climbs by that shot's xG. Steeper, sustained climbs (shaded) mark spells of real pressure.
The match in three battles
Chance qualityABERDEEN EDGE
1.16 – 0.37
Expected goals
AFC xG baseline: 1.10
0.06 – 0.06
xG per shot
18 – 6
shots (AFC – St. Mirren)
Chance quality was broadly even between the sides.
Territory & progressionEVEN
2.99 – 1.87
Expected threat created
AFC xT baseline: 2.12
—
field tilt
62 – 53
final-third entries
Territory was relatively even, but Aberdeen's passing generated more threat than usual.
Defensive resistanceABERDEEN EDGE
0.37 xGA
chances conceded
0.60 better than AFC baseline (0.97)
—
St. Mirren box touches
0.06
xG per St. Mirren shot
A resilient defensive display — chances conceded were below Aberdeen's usual level.
Where this performance ranks
Against Aberdeen’s other matches this season — only the standout highs and lows.
A middle-of-the-road performance by this season’s standards — no category stood out as a high or low.
Form:LLWDL(last 5)
Home this season: 8-5-6, 0.00–0.00 xG avg
Detailed stats not available for this match