Aberdeen
0–0
FT · Draw
Hibernian
0.30xG
-1.64AFC xGD
xG1.95
Expected points 0.20–2.44
Tight gameThe verdict
Event data: Opta
An even game, an even result.
Hibernian generated more attacking volume — 17 shots and — box touches to Aberdeen's 8 and —. The penalty stretched the headline xG (0.30–1.95) well beyond the non-penalty picture, which was almost level at 0.30–1.16.
Result model · all chances
Expected points 0.20 – 2.44
From the full xG (0.30–1.95), penalty included.
Performance model · excl. penalty
Expected 0.73 pts
From non-penalty xG (0.30–1.16). Took 1.
Little fortune either way.Result and performance broadly matched.
xG timeline
Aberdeen 0.30Hibernian 1.95GoalAberdeen above · opponent below · shaded = sustained pressure
Each step is a shot; the line climbs by that shot's xG. Steeper, sustained climbs (shaded) mark spells of real pressure.
The match in three battles
Chance qualitySTRONG OPPONENT EDGE
0.30 – 1.95
Expected goals
AFC xG baseline: 1.24 · non-penalty 0.30–1.16
0.04 – 0.11
xG per shot
8 – 17
shots (AFC – Hibernian)
Hibernian created the higher-quality chances per shot.
Territory & progressionEVEN
1.56 – 2.51
Expected threat created
AFC xT baseline: 1.68
—
field tilt
67 – 62
final-third entries
Territory was relatively even.
Defensive resistanceOPPONENT EDGE
1.95 xGA
chances conceded
0.31 worse than AFC baseline (1.64)
—
Hibernian box touches
0.11
xG per Hibernian shot
Aberdeen conceded better chances than they usually do.
Where this performance ranks
Against Aberdeen’s other matches this season — only the standout highs and lows.
A middle-of-the-road performance by this season’s standards — no category stood out as a high or low.
Form:WWWWL(last 5)
Home this season: 13-2-4, 0.00–0.00 xG avg
Detailed stats not available for this match