Celtic
5–0
FT · Loss
Aberdeen
3.56xG
-3.56AFC xGD
xG0.00
Expected points 2.44–0.20
Deserved defeatThe verdict
Event data: Opta
A fair defeat.
Celtic generated more attacking volume — 20 shots and — box touches to Aberdeen's 0 and —.
Result model · all chances
Expected points 0.20 – 2.44
From the full xG (0.00–3.56), penalty included.
Performance model · excl. penalty
Expected 0.20 pts
From non-penalty xG (0.00–3.56). Took 0.
Little fortune either way.Result and performance broadly matched.
xG timeline
Aberdeen 0.00Celtic 3.56GoalAberdeen above · opponent below · shaded = sustained pressure
Each step is a shot; the line climbs by that shot's xG. Steeper, sustained climbs (shaded) mark spells of real pressure.
The match in three battles
Chance qualitySTRONG OPPONENT EDGE
0.00 – 3.56
Expected goals
AFC xG baseline: 1.24
— – 0.18
xG per shot
0 – 20
shots (AFC – Celtic)
Chance quality was broadly even between the sides.
Territory & progressionEVEN
1.36 – 3.50
Expected threat created
AFC xT baseline: 1.68
—
field tilt
35 – 85
final-third entries
Territory was relatively even.
Defensive resistanceOPPONENT EDGE
3.56 xGA
chances conceded
1.93 worse than AFC baseline (1.64)
—
Celtic box touches
0.18
xG per Celtic shot
Aberdeen conceded better chances than they usually do.
Where this performance ranks
Against Aberdeen’s other matches this season — only the standout highs and lows.
0.00xG
38th of 38 · season worst
0shots
38th of 38 · season worst
3.56xGA
37th of 38 · among the worst
-3.56xGD
37th of 38 · among the worst
Form:WLDLW(last 5)
Away this season: 5-1-13, 0.00–0.00 xG avg
Detailed stats not available for this match