Aberdeen
0–1
FT · Loss
Celtic
0.06xG
-2.29AFC xGD
xG2.36
Expected points 0.20–2.44
Deserved defeatThe verdict
Event data: Opta
A fair defeat.
Celtic generated more attacking volume — 33 shots and — box touches to Aberdeen's 2 and —.
Result model · all chances
Expected points 0.20 – 2.44
From the full xG (0.06–2.36), penalty included.
Performance model · excl. penalty
Expected 0.20 pts
From non-penalty xG (0.06–2.36). Took 0.
Little fortune either way.Result and performance broadly matched.
xG timeline
Aberdeen 0.06Celtic 2.36GoalAberdeen above · opponent below · shaded = sustained pressure
Each step is a shot; the line climbs by that shot's xG. Steeper, sustained climbs (shaded) mark spells of real pressure.
The match in three battles
Chance qualitySTRONG OPPONENT EDGE
0.06 – 2.36
Expected goals
AFC xG baseline: 1.24
0.03 – 0.07
xG per shot
2 – 33
shots (AFC – Celtic)
Celtic created the higher-quality chances per shot.
Territory & progressionEVEN
0.57 – 3.93
Expected threat created
AFC xT baseline: 1.68
—
field tilt
44 – 100
final-third entries
Territory was relatively even.
Defensive resistanceOPPONENT EDGE
2.36 xGA
chances conceded
0.72 worse than AFC baseline (1.64)
—
Celtic box touches
0.07
xG per Celtic shot
Aberdeen conceded better chances than they usually do.
Where this performance ranks
Against Aberdeen’s other matches this season — only the standout highs and lows.
0.06xG
37th of 38 · among the worst
2shots
37th of 38 · among the worst
16progressive passes
37th of 38 · among the worst
Form:WLWLW(last 5)
Home this season: 13-2-4, 0.00–0.00 xG avg
Detailed stats not available for this match