Rangers
2–1
FT · Loss
Aberdeen
2.12xG
-1.59AFC xGD
xG0.53
Expected points 2.44–0.20
Deserved defeatThe verdict
Event data: Opta
A fair defeat.
Rangers generated more attacking volume — 23 shots and 0 box touches to Aberdeen's 9 and 0.
Result model · all chances
Expected points 0.20 – 2.44
From the full xG (0.53–2.12), penalty included.
Performance model · excl. penalty
Expected 0.20 pts
From non-penalty xG (0.53–2.12). Took 0.
Little fortune either way.Result and performance broadly matched.
xG timeline
Aberdeen 0.53Rangers 2.12GoalAberdeen above · opponent below · shaded = sustained pressure
Each step is a shot; the line climbs by that shot's xG. Steeper, sustained climbs (shaded) mark spells of real pressure.
The match in three battles
Chance qualitySTRONG OPPONENT EDGE
0.53 – 2.12
Expected goals
AFC xG baseline: 1.41
0.06 – 0.09
xG per shot
9 – 23
shots (AFC – Rangers)
Rangers created the higher-quality chances per shot.
Territory & progressionEVEN
0.97 – 2.77
Expected threat created
AFC xT baseline: 2.17
—
field tilt
44 – 86
final-third entries
Territory was relatively even.
Defensive resistanceOPPONENT EDGE
2.12 xGA
chances conceded
0.57 worse than AFC baseline (1.55)
0 (base 2)
Rangers box touches
0.09
xG per Rangers shot
Aberdeen conceded better chances than they usually do.
Where this performance ranks
Against Aberdeen’s other matches this season — only the standout highs and lows.
15progressive passes
37th of 38 · among the worst
Form:WDLDD(last 5)
Away this season: 5-5-9, 0.00–0.00 xG avg
Detailed stats not available for this match