The verdict
Event data: Opta
An even game on chances that Aberdeen lost.
10–11 shots · 1–3 big chances · 1.00–1.24 NPxG
Watch Highlights
SPFL YouTubeSummary
How the match was decided
The match in three battles
Chance qualityOPPONENT EDGE
1.00 – 2.03
Expected goals · Aberdeen – Motherwell
AFC xG baseline: 1.19 · non-penalty 1.00–1.24
0.10 – 0.18
xG per shot
10 – 11
shots
Motherwell created the higher-quality chances per shot.
Territory & progressionOPPONENT EDGE
1.72 – 2.52
Expected threat created · Aberdeen – Motherwell
AFC xT baseline: 1.88
46% – 54%
field tilt
45 – 60
final-third entries
Territory was relatively even.
Defensive resistanceOPPONENT EDGE
2.03 xGA
chances conceded
0.47 worse than AFC baseline (1.56)
24 (base 25)
Motherwell box touches
0.18
xG per Motherwell shot
Aberdeen conceded better chances than they usually do.
ShapeAberdeen started 3-4-2-1 and stayed in it for the whole match. Motherwell stayed in 4-2-3-1 throughout.
The match by half
| Aberdeen | Usual | Motherwell | |
|---|---|---|---|
| xG | 1.00 | 1.19 | 2.03 |
| Big chances | 1 | 1.8 | 3 |
| Touches in box | 18 | 21.6 | 24 |
| Possession % | 37 | 48.1 | 63 |
Chance creation was fairly even across the two halves.
Usual = Aberdeen’s average for this half this season.
How this is measured
FotMob period stats. Usual = Aberdeen’s average for this half across 38 games in 2025-26. Green or red marks a figure clearly above or below our own norm, never a comparison with Motherwell.
Lineups
Shots
Where the chances came from
xG timeline
Aberdeen 1.00Motherwell 2.03GoalAberdeen above · opponent below · shaded = sustained pressure
13%
21%
67%
Match odds from simulating these shots at their own xG (20,000 runs) — for fun, not a prediction: it scores what should have happened, not what did.
Each step is a shot; the line climbs by that shot's xG. Steeper, sustained climbs (shaded) mark spells of real pressure.
Aberdeen shots
Goal
Saved
Blocked
Post
Off target
10 shots
Motherwell shots
2 goals: 1 open play, 1 pen
Goal
Saved
Blocked
Post
Off target
11 shots
Shot mix & shots over time
10shots · 4 on target · 1.00 xG
By situation
70%
20%
10%
Open play770%
Counter220%
Free kick / throw110%
By body part
50%
30%
20%
Right foot550%
Left foot330%
Head220%
How this is measured
Every shot in one bucket only. Open play covers unassisted and assisted attempts; counter is a fast break; free kicks, direct set pieces and throw-in routines are grouped because there are rarely enough of any one of them in a single match to read separately. A mix heavy on corners and free kicks with few open-play shots means the side needed a dead ball to get near the goal.
Shots over timefull match · drag to focus a period
Aberdeen 10Motherwell 11
0'HTFT
Drag across the chart to pick any window.
How this is measured
Five-minute buckets — a side takes roughly a dozen shots a match, so the two-minute bars used for passing would be almost all gaps. Use the buttons for the common windows, or drag across the chart for anything else.
In context
| Aberdeen | This match | This season 10 games | 5-year 195 games | SPFL average 116 team-games | Where that sits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10 | 12.8 | 12.2 | 14.4 | about normal · 68 of 195 lower |
| about normal · 68 of 195 lower | |||||
| Shots in the box | 6 | 8.3 | 8 | 9.9 | below usual · 54 of 195 lower |
| below usual · 54 of 195 lower | |||||
marker = 5-year mean
Passing
How the ball moved
Build-Up Play
Where Aberdeen's passes were and how they progressed the ball
Pass Territory
53.7%
35.1%
11.2%
Own Half
Middle
Final 3rd
Season avg: 46.1% own half
GK Distribution
GK Long Ball %
38.5%avg 60.7%
GK Total Passes
39avg 31
Build-Up Quality
Own-Half Accuracy
89.7%avg 86.1%
Progression
Progressive Passes
38avg 50
Directness
56.2%avg 57.9%
Season avg
Above avg
Below avg
In context · full match
| Aberdeen | This match | This season 10 games | 5-year 195 games | Where that sits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passes | 349 | 396.2 | 393 | about normal · 68 of 195 lower |
| about normal · 68 of 195 lower | ||||
| Pass accuracy % | 79.4 | 75.5 | 72.3 | above usual · 160 of 195 lower |
| above usual · 160 of 195 lower | ||||
| Passes into the final third | 25 | 30.8 | 25.4 | about normal · 104 of 195 lower |
| about normal · 104 of 195 lower | ||||
| Long balls | 47 | 57.5 | 57.9 | below usual · 34 of 195 lower |
| below usual · 34 of 195 lower | ||||
| Long balls, % of passes | 13.5 | 14.8 | 15.6 | about normal · 68 of 195 lower |
| about normal · 68 of 195 lower | ||||
marker = 5-year mean
Players
Player contributions
Player contributions
GK
M
D. MitovGK90'
30/39
Pass
100%
Duels
1
Saves
DEF
T
K. TobersDEF61'
22/25
Pass
67%
Duels
2
Tkl+Int
J. MilneDEF90'
6 clearances
46/51
Pass
0%
Duels
0
Tkl+Int
M. KnoesterDEF45'
28/32
Pass
33%
Duels
3
Tkl+Int
MID
D
N. DevlinMID90'
1 key pass
11/16
Pass
50%
Duels
1
Key P
P
A. PalaversaMID90'
3 interceptions
28/33
Pass
67%
Duels
-
Key P
S
G. ShinnieMID61'
1 key pass · 5 tackles
19/24
Pass
78%
Duels
1
Key P
E. GyamfiMID45'
1 key pass
5/10
Pass
33%
Duels
1
Key P
FWD
A
A. AouchicheFWD90'
3 interceptions
18/25
Pass
20%
Duels
1
Shots
K
J. KarlssonFWD90'
1 big chance created · 4 key passes
20/28
Pass
40%
Duels
2
Shots
K. NisbetFWD80'
2 key passes · 3 shots · 4 aerials won
12/15
Pass
57%
Duels
3
Shots
Substitutes
D
A. DorringtonDEF45'
20/21
Pass
50%
Duels
1
Tkl+Int
K
T. KeskinenFWD45'
9/13
Pass
20%
Duels
1
Shots
J
A. JensenMID29'
7/7
Pass
100%
Duels
-
Key P
C
L. ClarksonMID29'
1 key pass
14/20
Pass
50%
Duels
1
Key P
L
M. LazetićFWD10'
1/2
Pass
100%
Duels
1
Shots
Context
How this match compares
Where this performance ranks
Against Aberdeen’s other matches this season — only the standout highs and lows.
A middle-of-the-road performance by this season’s standards — no category stood out as a high or low.
Form:LLLDL(last 5)
Away this season: 4-2-13, 0.96–1.71 xG avg
Historical Context
Games at this ground, and how this match compares to the season so far
At Motherwell — every meeting on record
4-2-3(9 games)
1.22–1.46avg xG (n=8)
WLLWWWDLD
This match vs season so far
37 comparable games — each metric says how many of them actually have that stat.
xG
1.00avg 1.20
19th worst of 38 · Highest 3.76, 14 December 2025 (2-1) · Lowest 0.32, 11 January 2026 (0-2)
xGA
2.03avg 1.55
8th worst of 38 · Highest 4.72, 21 December 2025 (1-3) · Lowest 0.10, 11 April 2026 (2-0)
Possession
37%avg 48%
5th worst of 38 · Highest 72%, 27 December 2025 (1-1) · Lowest 27%, 21 December 2025 (1-3)
Shots
10.0avg 11.3
18th best of 38 · Highest 21.0, 6 December 2025 (3-1) · Lowest 5.0, 28 February 2026 (0-1)
Shots on target
4.0avg 3.4
11th best of 38 · Highest 9.0, 5 October 2025 (4-0) · Lowest 0.0, 3 January 2026 (0-1)
Big chances
1.0avg 1.8
19th best of 38 · Highest 5.0, 14 December 2025 (2-1) · Lowest 0.0, 23 November 2025 (1-0)
Box touches
16.0avg 21.4
12th worst of 38 · Highest 35.0, 24 January 2026 (6-2) · Lowest 7.0, 21 March 2026 (1-4)
Final third entries
45.0avg 55.7
12th worst of 38 · Highest 85.0, 14 March 2026 (1-1) · Lowest 29.0, 21 December 2025 (1-3)
Key passes
10.0avg 8.1
11th best of 38 · Highest 15.0, 5 October 2025 (4-0) · Lowest 3.0, 23 November 2025 (1-0)
Corners
4.0avg 4.7
17th best of 38 · Highest 11.0, 5 October 2025 (4-0) · Lowest 1.0, 10 August 2025 (0-2)
Tackles
15.0avg 15.8
19th worst of 38 · Highest 27.0, 9 November 2025 (1-1) · Lowest 6.0, 27 December 2025 (1-1)
Interceptions
7.0avg 8.5
19th worst of 38 · Highest 20.0, 28 February 2026 (0-1) · Lowest 2.0, 27 December 2025 (1-1)
PPDA
21.6avg 14.9
3rd worst of 33 · Highest 31.4, 10 August 2025 (0-2) · Lowest 9.3, 11 January 2026 (0-2)
Counter-press rate
3%avg 6%
8th worst of 33 · Highest 11%, 24 February 2026 (0-0) · Lowest 2%, 9 November 2025 (1-1)
avg
Above avg
Below avg

